While basketball is a much more team-centric sport than baseball Edwin Encarnacion Jersey , a basketball lineup's success also often hinges heaviest on a singular star. Baseball is much more individualistic on a pitch-by-pitch basis, with the team's success determined by collective players' successes. James can drive repeatedly into the paint by himself to score, but the only way Trout can drive himself in is by smacking a pitch out of the ballpark.By all value metrics, James has been among the best players in the NBA during the last five seasons, but he is by no means head and shoulders above the rest statistically, a claim Trout can make. According to Basketball Reference, Russell Westbrook places first among his peers since 2013-14, posting a total of 104.8 WAR(approximate value calculated by multiplying VORP by 2.7, per Basketball Reference)in the last five years. James, in comparison Andrew Miller Jersey , comes in second with 101.8 WAR. The most widely accepted value statistic, player efficiency rating, places James (27.7) third in the last five years, behind Kevin Durant (28.0) and Anthony Davis (27.8).Many of the strong feelings about James' dominance stem from his success in the postseason, which has produced three titles and eight straight trips to the NBA Finals. Trout, on the other hand, has only played once in the playoffs, getting one hit in a Kansas City Royals sweep of the Los Angeles Angels. Trout can only do so much by himself, even if he's disproportionally more impactful on a baseball field than any of his peers.James' greatness is undeniable. From his raw athleticism to his explosiveness to the endless highlight reels, James is a one-of-a-kind athlete. But while he rises above the pack of current basketball stars Tyler Naquin Jersey , he does have contemporaries, most notably Kevin Durant. Trout does not have peers in this current crop of baseball stars, and there should be no doubt about the identity of the best male athlete of this generation. There won't be someone who even comes close, no Pacino to Trout's De Niro.In Trout, we are watching one of the most dominant athletes in sports history.The next step is getting people to care. Apparently, the first rule about tricking the umpire isn't don't talk about tricking the umpire.According to Blake Richardson and Andy McCullough of the Los Angeles Times, New York Mets third baseman Todd Frazier admitted to the media and Los Angeles DodgersoutfielderAlex Verdugo that he switched balls and fooled the umpire into thinking he actually caught Verdugo's foul ball in Monday's game.Richardson and McCullough explained Verdugo fouled a pitch near the crowd, prompting Frazier to dive into the stands. While the ball slipped out of Frazier's glove as he landed, he grabbed a replica ball from the stands and held it up.The umpire, fooled http://www.indiansfanproshop.com/authentic-cody-allen-jersey , proceeded to call Verdugo out."But at the time, they thought he caught it," Verdugo said. "So you got to give it to him."Steve Gelbs of SportsNet New York was the first to report Frazier didn't actually catch it and broke down the play using video:SportsNet New York SNYtv.SteveGelbs reveals the TRUTH behind the FlavaFraz21 diving 鈥渃atch鈥?on Monday.Video don鈥檛 lie! P4a1gBQIXeVerdugo still had a productive day Monday, going 2-for-4 with a double, but the Mets won the game, 4-2. A three-run home run by Brandon Nimmo in the top of the ninth proved to be the difference and handed the Dodgers an important loss in the postseason race.New York took two of three in the series from Los Angeles, dropping the Dodgers to 76-64. They are 1.5 games behind the Colorado Rockies in the National League West and two games behind the St. Louis Cardinals for the final wild-card spot with a critical three-game set scheduled in Colorado this weekend.Los Angeles will have to worry about catching the Rockies in the division, but at least they won't have to concern themselves with Frazier tricking the umpires in their next series.